Blog post by Florian Vidal, REVOLVE Fellow
It has been a while since my last post! Don’t worry I didn’t suffocate under research papers and on the contrary, my work is progressing fine. Today I’m going to focus on an event I participated in which was a workshop organized by ESA. ESA stands for European Space Agency and its role is to provide, for exclusively peaceful purposes, cooperation among European states in space research and technology and their space applications. It also promoting space with outreach (follow their mascot Paxi!) Furthermore, ESA is involved in state-of-the art project such as Galileo, the European GPS.
The topic of the workshop I attended was about concurrent engineering, the art of combining several engineering fields to find an optimal design. I am going to present to you the process we went through to design a spacecraft to go to the moon.
The workshop took place in ESA’s European space Security and Education Centre (ESEC) in Redu, a remote Belgian village 2 hours from Brussels. This place was chosen years ago by ESA to minimize interference for satellite operations while remaining in the center of Europe. When I arrived to the hotel I was really surprised by the diversity of nationalities amongst the participants. We were 20 university students, Spanish, German, Polish, Dutch, Italian, Romanian, Portuguese, English and French. Moreover 2 system engineers from ESA were there to support us during this week.
We were welcomed by ESA staff at ESA Academy’s Training and Learning Centre. There, we were presented ESA and ESA Education Programme, and our mission for the following days: designing a low-cost spacecraft to bring a rover to the moon using ESA Educational Concurrent Engineering Facility (CDF). The name of the mission was LIAR (Lunar Impactor And Rover). The mission consisted in a spacecraft that would impact the moon instead of landing softly. That way we would use less fuel hence a lighter spacecraft. This spacecraft would bring a rover to the moon for an observation mission (taking pictures).
The team was composed of several sub-teams divided by subsystems: thermal; communications/data handling; structures; trajectory; configuration; propulsion; and, power. I was working on communication and data handling subsystems with another student. Concretely our work consisted in finding a/some ground station(s), designing the communication module to enable control, telemetry, and the downlink of the pictures the rover would take on the moon.
We also had the opportunity to visit ESEC facilities. For example, we went into the Proba Operations Control Room. Proba satellites are 3 Belgian observation satellites: Proba-1 is observing Earth; Proba-2 the sun; and, Proba-V vegetation. Their information is precious and can be used for agricultural, weather or scientific purposes.
During the last 2 days of the Workshop we worked hard to find an optimal solution. It was really challenging in the way all the subsystems interact with other subsystems. For example, as I was working on communications, trade-offs between the number of pictures we can send and the power required on the spacecraft were to be made. It was hard negotiations! The tools provided by ESA and the fact that we were all in the same room were essential to iterate quickly to cross out non-feasible solutions.
In the end I was really surprised by the result of our work. I honestly thought that we could not achieve anything in 4 days for such complex mission but finally the solution we reached seemed not too far-reached! Many thanks to ESA Education Office team for this exciting week!